Reds Stud Jay Bruce private signing

I'm with sprtsstar4ever... Jay Bruce has a very short simple autograph so I would probably like an inscription or two to add to the graph
 
I'm with sprtsstar4ever... Jay Bruce has a very short simple autograph so I would probably like an inscription or two to add to the graph

No offense but what does that have to do with anything? Wayne Gretzky has a short graph too but people still pay. Mark Messier, slop and thats at $500 a pop with Steiner. A players graph is a players graph. I told them we need jersey # and sig. Inscriptions like MLB Debut, etc I am working on.
 
No offense but what does that have to do with anything? Wayne Gretzky has a short graph too but people still pay. Mark Messier, slop and thats at $500 a pop with Steiner. A players graph is a players graph. I told them we need jersey # and sig. Inscriptions like MLB Debut, etc I am working on.

And his autograph isn't even that bad or short. Look at the crap Ovechkin puts on stuff or Lebron or the hyrogliphics Marian Hossa puts down. Who cares? It's his sig so you either want it or you don't.
 
This is what I will assume he will be signing since (a) it is his signature and (b) he's getting paid.

[Sportsgraphing.com] Reds Stud Jay Bruce private signing
 
No offense but what does that have to do with anything? Wayne Gretzky has a short graph too but people still pay. Mark Messier, slop and thats at $500 a pop with Steiner. A players graph is a players graph. I told them we need jersey # and sig. Inscriptions like MLB Debut, etc I am working on.

What is has to do is with overall appearance. I am not complaining about the autograph he will give because that is his autograph so I accept that but what I was saying is since it is so short for display purposes I would like a ball with an inscription or two because it adds to the signature and in my opinion makes the ball look much nicer
 
Back
Top